Every year, there are always a few celebrities involved in some type of lawsuit, whether it is against a large corporation or a small business. However, celebrity lawsuits regarding libel or invasion of privacy are not as common.
In May 2009, Academy Award Winner, Kate Winslet, filed a libel lawsuit against the Daily Mail newspaper. The London newspaper had published an article claiming Winslet lied about her exercise habits and referred to her as “the world’s most irritating actress.” The feature also displayed naked photographs of the actress to further prove their argument.
Winslet insisted the organization’s publication had “injured her personal and professional reputation” because she is said to be a significant role model for young woman. The case was later taken to London’s High Court in November 2009 where the court ruled in favor of Kate Winslet, awarding her with $41,000 in libel damage. In a statement about her win, Winslet commented, “I strongly believe that women should be encouraged to accept themselves as they are, so to suggest that I was lying was an unacceptable accusation of hypocrisy.”
In my opinion, I completely agree with the ruling of this case. Without question, this act, committed by the news organization, is both uncalled for and illegal. By printing this article, the Daily Mail clearly violated the law of defamation, which is an unprotected form of expression.
According to Laws.com, this law oversees controversies dealing with slander and libel, “which are communicated statements that claim to be factual and done so in a way that is usually negative or harmful to another party.”
In Winslet’s case, the London newspaper printed falsified information about the actress’ exercising rituals; therefore, committing a libel action. Winslet even stated that she was “…particularly upset to be accused of lying…and felt that I had a responsibility to request an apology in order to demonstrate my commitment to the views that I have always expressed about body issues, including diet and exercise.”
After reviewing many articles on this lawsuit (Us Magazine, BBC News, UPI.com), I believe Kate Winslet fully deserves the court’s settlement. Since the Daily Mail has made a libel violation, it is only fair that the news organization pay the consequences.